42RLPACwZPx3vYYmxSueqsogfynBDqXK298EDsNoyoHi

Operational summary

This wallet should be treated as high risk for compliance and operations workflows. On 20 November 2025, Circle froze the Solana USDC balance at 42RLPACwZPx3vYYmxSueqsogfynBDqXK298EDsNoyoHi via a FreezeAccount transaction. A later scan rated the wallet critical and reported both a direct OFAC sanctions match and an on-chain issuer blacklist match for USDC.

Why this wallet matters

For risk and operations teams, this is a clear issuer freeze event on a Solana USDC address. This is not a generic heuristic; Circle exercised issuer control to freeze USDC at the wallet, and the scan also reports a direct on-chain Circle blacklist match. That makes the wallet operationally difficult to interact with because any USDC sent to it can be frozen, and receiving funds from it creates a touchpoint with a frozen and sanctions-flagged address.

The scan also reports a direct sanctions match to an OFAC individual listing for Rolan SOKOLOVSKI. That is a critical hit, but it should be read carefully: the scan says the wallet directly matches the listing, not that ownership is established.

Transaction and funding context

The only on-chain freeze evidence supplied is the Circle FreezeAccount event at 2025-11-20T15:30:39Z. The token account involved was B1jUqZENAXMJxBu3pX9v1yq2QDtMeXz1CUiFMr9hsi4f, and the observed USDC balance after the freeze was 0.01 USDC (~$0.01).

Funding context is thin. The scan attempted to recover transfer history but the Helius request stopped before completion. No tracked transfers, no counterparty flow, and no initial funding source were returned. This means the source of funds is unknown at this time.

Risk signals to monitor

• Freeze event: Circle has already frozen the USDC balance, so the wallet is on the issuer's frozen list.
• Sanctions match: The scan reports a direct OFAC match to Rolan SOKOLOVSKI. Monitor whether additional sanctions data or wallet behavior confirms this link.
• Incomplete history: The lack of transfer data makes it harder to identify related wallets, cluster activity, or estimate pre-freeze value.
• Blacklist finding: The scan's DIRECT_ISSUER_BLACKLIST_MATCH is consistent with the freeze event, but the raw blacklist match list is empty; this should be rechecked after a full rescan.

Evidence quality

The freeze transaction is specific and timestamped, giving high confidence that an issuer freeze occurred. The sanctions match is a scan-level finding with low confidence for attribution because the underlying match logic and identity verification are not in the evidence. Transfer history quality is limited: activity data is marked unavailable, the scan is labeled provisional, and the provider request was truncated. Until a complete rescan succeeds, the full risk picture remains partially open.